Summary
The speaker tells his
beloved to look at the flea before them and to note "how little" is
that thing that she denies him. For the flea, he says, has sucked first his
blood, then her blood, so that now, inside the flea, they are mingled; and that
mingling cannot be called "sin, or shame, or loss of maidenhead." The
flea has joined them together in a way that, "alas, is more than we would
do."
As his beloved moves to kill the flea, the speaker stays her hand,
asking her to spare the three lives in the flea: his life, her life, and the
flea's own life. In the flea, he says, where their blood is mingled, they are
almost married-no, more than married-and the flea is their marriage bed and
marriage temple mixed into one. Though their parents grudge their romance and
though she will not make love to him, they are nevertheless united and
cloistered in the living walls of the flea. She is apt to kill him, he says,
but he asks that she not kill herself by killing the flea that contains her
blood; he says that to kill the flea would be sacrilege, "three sins in
killing three."
"Cruel and sudden," the speaker calls his lover, who has now
killed the flea, "purpling" her fingernail with the "blood of
innocence." The speaker asks his lover what the flea's sin was, other than
having sucked from each of them a drop of blood. He says that his lover replies
that neither of them is less noble for having killed the flea. It is true, he
says, and it is this very fact that proves that her fears are false: If she
were to sleep with him ("yield to me"), she would lose no more honor
than she lost when she killed the flea.
Commentary
This funny little poem again exhibits Donne's metaphysical love-poem
mode, his aptitude for turning even the least likely images into elaborate
symbols of love and romance. This poem uses the image of a flea that has just
bitten the speaker and his beloved to sketch an amusing conflict over whether,
the two will engage in premarital sex. The speaker wants to, the beloved does
not, and so the speaker, highly clever but grasping at straws, uses the flea, in
whose body his blood mingles with his beloved's, to show how innocuous such
mingling can be--he reasons that if mingling in the flea is so innocuous,
sexual mingling would be equally innocuous, for they are really the same thing.
By the second stanza, the speaker is trying to save the flea's life, holding it
up as "our marriage bed and marriage temple."
But
when the beloved kills the flea despite the speaker's protestations (and
probably as a deliberate move to squash his argument, as well), he turns his argument
on its head and claims that despite the high-minded and sacred ideals he has
just been invoking, killing the flea did not really impugn his beloved's
honor-and despite the high-minded and sacred ideals she has invoked in refusing
to sleep with him, doing so would not impugn her honor either.
This
poem is the cleverest of a long line of sixteenth-century love poems using the
flea as an erotic image, a genre derived from an older poem of Ovid. Donne's
poise of hinting at the erotic without ever explicitly referring to sex, while
at the same time leaving no doubt as to exactly what he means, is as much a
source of the poem's humor as the silly image of the flea is; the idea that
being bitten by a flea would represent "sin, or shame, or loss of maidenhead"
gets the point across with a neat conciseness and clarity that Donne's later
religious lyrics never attained.
No comments:
Post a Comment